Girl Names Starting With P
Among the 2025 P names for girls, Penelope sits on top with 6,225 registered births. 2 of them rank inside the year's overall top 100.
| Rank | Name | Babies |
|---|---|---|
| #22 | Penelope | 6,225 |
| #67 | Paisley | 3,508 |
| #106 | Parker | 2,536 |
| #155 | Piper | 1,940 |
| #157 | Phoebe | 1,885 |
| #199 | Peyton | 1,559 |
| #225 | Presley | 1,362 |
| #232 | Palmer | 1,330 |
| #292 | Poppy | 1,054 |
| #346 | Paige | 884 |
| #440 | Payton | 701 |
| #534 | Phoenix | 567 |
| #544 | Priscilla | 555 |
| #592 | Paris | 497 |
| #669 | Paislee | 423 |
| #735 | Persephone | 372 |
| #740 | Penny | 368 |
| #777 | Pearl | 350 |
| #784 | Paulina | 346 |
| #793 | Paloma | 343 |
| #826 | Promise | 330 |
| #855 | Paula | 318 |
| #1,045 | Paisleigh | 238 |
| #1,122 | Princess | 209 |
| #1,238 | Prisha | 182 |
| #1,260 | Paola | 178 |
| #1,297 | Patience | 172 |
| #1,336 | Patricia | 167 |
| #1,372 | Petra | 161 |
| #1,456 | Pia | 148 |
| #1,509 | Preslee | 142 |
| #1,536 | Paulette | 138 |
| #1,590 | Perla | 132 |
| #1,863 | Paityn | 107 |
| #1,864 | Pippa | 107 |
| #1,907 | Pepper | 102 |
| #1,920 | Philomena | 101 |
| #1,956 | Priya | 99 |
| #2,113 | Prudence | 89 |
| #2,211 | Priscila | 84 |
| #2,233 | Perry | 83 |
| #2,251 | Pamela | 82 |
| #2,252 | Psalm | 82 |
| #2,273 | Presleigh | 81 |
| #2,318 | Polly | 79 |
| #2,561 | Primrose | 69 |
| #2,578 | Porter | 68 |
| #2,679 | Posie | 65 |
| #2,680 | Praise | 65 |
| #2,808 | Philippa | 61 |
Ranks are overall positions among all 2025 girl names, so gaps between rows are real. For a random shortlist, spin P girl names in the generator, or scan the full top 100 girl names.
Other letters
Boy names for this letter: boy names starting with P.
Source: every name, rank, and count on this page comes from the U.S. Social Security Administration's national baby-names dataset (2025 data, from Social Security card applications). It is public-domain U.S. government data; names given fewer than 5 times in a year are excluded by the SSA, spelling variants are counted separately, and the data covers U.S. births only. Full caveats on the methodology page.